ANALYZING CONTEXT - FRAMING THE DISCUSSION

Authors
Citation
K. Tracy, ANALYZING CONTEXT - FRAMING THE DISCUSSION, Research on language and social interaction, 31(1), 1998, pp. 1-28
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Social",Communication,"Language & Linguistics
ISSN journal
08351813
Volume
31
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1 - 28
Database
ISI
SICI code
0835-1813(1998)31:1<1:AC-FTD>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
If I can just, I wanted to just jump on one distinction, and that is t he intrinsic-extrinsic in the context book by Duranti and Goodwin. I t hink, well that's a common distinction in conversation analysis. Cicou rel uses a different distinction. And I think the language we use to d escribe the issue itself is one that reflects values. So for instance, I would talk about narrow context and broad context. Now that begins to suggest a different valuing than intrinsic and extrinsic, which is somehow if it's intrinsic it's good, if it's extrinsic it's a little b it shaky. Whereas when we start to talk about narrow and broad I think it in general is good to be broad and not be narrow, so that we begin to load, if you will, our evaluations of what is valued just as we be ing to talk about them.(1)