DOUBLE-BLIND, MULTICENTER TRIAL TO COMPARE THE EFFICACY OF INTRAMUSCULAR DIHYDROERGOTAMINE PLUS HYDROXYZINE VERSUS INTRAMUSCULAR MEPERIDINEPLUS HYDROXYZINE FOR THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT TREATMENT OF ACUTE MIGRAINE HEADACHE

Citation
Sc. Carleton et al., DOUBLE-BLIND, MULTICENTER TRIAL TO COMPARE THE EFFICACY OF INTRAMUSCULAR DIHYDROERGOTAMINE PLUS HYDROXYZINE VERSUS INTRAMUSCULAR MEPERIDINEPLUS HYDROXYZINE FOR THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT TREATMENT OF ACUTE MIGRAINE HEADACHE, Annals of emergency medicine, 32(2), 1998, pp. 129-138
Citations number
46
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care
ISSN journal
01960644
Volume
32
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
129 - 138
Database
ISI
SICI code
0196-0644(1998)32:2<129:DMTTCT>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Study objective: To evaluate intramuscular dihydroergotamine in direct comparison with opioid analgesia in the treatment of acute migraine h eadache. Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, double-blind tr ial performed in the emergency departments of 11 general hospitals in the United States. One hundred seventy-one patients between the ages o f 18 and 60 years who presented to the ED with acute migraine headache were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 1 mg dihydroergotamine (DHE) or 1.5 mg/kg meperidine (MEP) by intramuscula r injection. The anti-nauseant hydroxyzine (H) was coadministered in b oth treatment groups. Results: One hundred fifty-six patients were eva luable. Treatment groups were comparable in sample size, demographics, and baseline measurements of headache pain. Reduction of headache pai n as measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale was 41 +/- 33 mm (53.5% reduction) for the DHE group, and 45 +/- 30 mm (55.7% reduction) for t he MEP group at 60 minutes after treatment (difference=2.2%; 95% confi dence interval [CI] -10%, 14.5%; P = .81). Reduction in the severity o f nausea and improvement in functional ability were similar between tr eatment groups. Central nervous system adverse events were less common in the DHE group (DHE 23.5% versus MEP 37.6%, difference = -14.1%: 95 % CI -28%, 0%). In particular, dizziness was reported less commonly wi th DHE than MEP (2% versus 15%, difference= -13%: 95% CI -21%, -5%). C onclusion: In this prospective, double-blind trial of a convenience sa mple of ED patients randomly assigned to one of two treatment regimens , DHE and MEP were comparable therapies for acute migraine. The use of DHE avoids several problems associated with opioid analgesia, includi ng dizziness.