Jj. Rankine et al., PAIN DRAWINGS IN THE ASSESSMENT OF NERVE ROOT COMPRESSION - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY WITH LUMBAR SPINE MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 23(15), 1998, pp. 1668-1676
Study Design. Prospective comparative study of pain drawings with find
ings on lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging. Objectives. To assess
the ability of the pain drawing to predict the presence of nerve root
compression. Summary of Background Data. Most research work has conce
ntrated on the ability of the pain drawing to act as a screening metho
d for psychological distress with less work directed at the influence
the anatomic abnormality has on the pain drawing. Methods, One hundred
thirty-four consecutive outpatients attending for lumbar magnetic res
onance imaging in the investigation of back and leg pain completed pai
n drawings and psychological testing immediately before the examinatio
n. The pain drawing was analyzed by previously reported criteria, and
the magnetic resonance imaging was assessed independently for the pres
ence of nerve compression by three radiologists. Multivariate stepwise
discriminant analysis was used to identify patients with nerve compre
ssion on the basis of their pain drawing. Results. Nerve compression w
as predicted by numbness in the anterolateral aspect of the foot. Ther
e was considerable overlap in the appearances of the pain drawings bet
ween patients with and without nerve compression, and the pain drawing
correctly classified only 58% Of patients with nerve compression. Con
clusions. The pain drawing is not a good predictor of nerve compressio
n on magnetic resonance imaging in a group of patients investigated fo
r back and leg pain. It should be interpreted with caution and in ligh
t of the full clinical picture.