ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIC SIGNIFICANCE OF LEFTWARD QRS AXIS DEVIATION IN BIFASCICULAR AND TRIFASCICULAR BLOCKS

Citation
V. Ducceschi et al., ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIC SIGNIFICANCE OF LEFTWARD QRS AXIS DEVIATION IN BIFASCICULAR AND TRIFASCICULAR BLOCKS, Clinical cardiology, 21(8), 1998, pp. 579-583
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Journal title
ISSN journal
01609289
Volume
21
Issue
8
Year of publication
1998
Pages
579 - 583
Database
ISI
SICI code
0160-9289(1998)21:8<579:ESOLQA>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Background: Intraventricular conduction disturbances determine complet e impairment of impulse propagation along the right or left bundle bra nch or the two left fascicles. Hypothesis: This study was undertaken t o investigate the electrophysiologic significance of QRS axis (QRSA) o rientation in bifascicular and trifascicular blocks. Methods: A group of 76 subjects, 43 with right bundle-branch block (RBBB) and left ante rior hemiblock (LAH) (Group A), and 33 with left bundle-branch block ( LBBB) (Group B) was submitted to electrophysiologic evaluation. Result s: In Group A, QRSA was inversely related only to intraventricular con duction, while in Group B, QRSA inversely related to infrahisal conduc tion times, A value of <-60 degrees was considered the cut-off point f or determining subjects with a considerable leftward QRSA deviation. O f the 27 Group A patients with a QRSA <-60 degrees, 38.5% developed an infrahisal second-degree atrioventricular (AV) block during increment al atrial stimulation (IAS) in comparison with 11.1% of those with QRS A >-60 degrees. Of the 9 Group B patients with a QRSA <-60 degrees, 44 .4% exhibited severe impairment of infrahisal conduction at baseline a nd 66.6% developed an infrahisal second-degree AV block during IAS, wh ereas among the remaining 24 with a QRSA >-60 degrees, in only 8.3% we re both infrahisal (HV1 and HV2) intervals dangerously prolonged, and 23.8% encountered an infrahisal second-degree AV block during IAS. In Group A, atrioventricular conduction time >200 ms exhibited a better p redictive accuracy than QRSA <-60 degrees for the development of an in frahisal second-degree AV block during IAS, whereas the latter appeare d the best noninvasive predictor in Group B with a slightly lesser pre dictive accuracy than HV >80 ms. Conclusion: The degree of leftward QR SA deviation seems to reflect the entity of intraventricular conductio n delay in patients with RBBB + LAH, while it appears to be directly r elated to infrahisal conduction prolongation in those with LBBB.