V. Ducceschi et al., ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIC SIGNIFICANCE OF LEFTWARD QRS AXIS DEVIATION IN BIFASCICULAR AND TRIFASCICULAR BLOCKS, Clinical cardiology, 21(8), 1998, pp. 579-583
Background: Intraventricular conduction disturbances determine complet
e impairment of impulse propagation along the right or left bundle bra
nch or the two left fascicles. Hypothesis: This study was undertaken t
o investigate the electrophysiologic significance of QRS axis (QRSA) o
rientation in bifascicular and trifascicular blocks. Methods: A group
of 76 subjects, 43 with right bundle-branch block (RBBB) and left ante
rior hemiblock (LAH) (Group A), and 33 with left bundle-branch block (
LBBB) (Group B) was submitted to electrophysiologic evaluation. Result
s: In Group A, QRSA was inversely related only to intraventricular con
duction, while in Group B, QRSA inversely related to infrahisal conduc
tion times, A value of <-60 degrees was considered the cut-off point f
or determining subjects with a considerable leftward QRSA deviation. O
f the 27 Group A patients with a QRSA <-60 degrees, 38.5% developed an
infrahisal second-degree atrioventricular (AV) block during increment
al atrial stimulation (IAS) in comparison with 11.1% of those with QRS
A >-60 degrees. Of the 9 Group B patients with a QRSA <-60 degrees, 44
.4% exhibited severe impairment of infrahisal conduction at baseline a
nd 66.6% developed an infrahisal second-degree AV block during IAS, wh
ereas among the remaining 24 with a QRSA >-60 degrees, in only 8.3% we
re both infrahisal (HV1 and HV2) intervals dangerously prolonged, and
23.8% encountered an infrahisal second-degree AV block during IAS. In
Group A, atrioventricular conduction time >200 ms exhibited a better p
redictive accuracy than QRSA <-60 degrees for the development of an in
frahisal second-degree AV block during IAS, whereas the latter appeare
d the best noninvasive predictor in Group B with a slightly lesser pre
dictive accuracy than HV >80 ms. Conclusion: The degree of leftward QR
SA deviation seems to reflect the entity of intraventricular conductio
n delay in patients with RBBB + LAH, while it appears to be directly r
elated to infrahisal conduction prolongation in those with LBBB.