Pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a challenging diagnostic problem becau
se it mimics other cardiopulmonary disorders. Pulmonary angiography is
still the reference standard for diagnosing PE but it is costly, inva
sive and not readily available. Non-invasive diagnostic strategies hav
e therefore been developed to forego pulmonary angiography in patients
suspected of having PE. Ventilation/perfusion lung scanning is, at pr
esent, the most widely used non-invasive diagnostic test for PE. A hig
h probability ventilation/perfusion scan (segmental or greater perfusi
on defects with normal ventilation:) warrants the institution of antic
oagulant therapy especially when paired with high clinical suspicion o
f PE. Yet, only a minority of patients with confirmed PE have high pro
bability ventilation/perfusion scans. Ventilation/perfusion abnormalit
ies other than those of the high probability scan should be regarded a
s non-diagnostic. Under these circumstances, documentation of deep vei
n thrombosis by non-invasive leg testing warrants anticoagulation with
out the need for angiography. However, a single negative venous study
result does not permit to rule out PE in patients with non-diagnostic
ventilation/perfusion scans. Results of a recent prospective study ind
icate that accurate diagnosis or exclusion of PE is possible with perf
usion lung scanning alone (without ventilation imaging). Combining per
fusion lung scanning with clinical assessment helps to restrict the ne
ed for angiography to a minority of patients with suspected PE. (C) 19
98 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.