Mk. Barry et al., TRANSABDOMINAL PREPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC INGUINAL HERNIORRHAPHY - ASSESSMENT OF INITIAL EXPERIENCE, Mayo Clinic proceedings, 73(8), 1998, pp. 717-723
Objective: To evaluate our initial experience with laparoscopic inguin
al herniorrhaphy. Design: We retrospectively studied a consecutive ser
ies of patients selectively chosen for laparoscopic repair of inguinal
hernia, Material and Methods: The study cohort consisted of 173 patie
nts treated by a single surgeon between 1992 and 1995, For all operati
ons, a transabdominal approach was used, Follow-up was obtained by tel
ephone contact or letter. Results: The study group consisted of 167 ma
le and 6 female patients with a mean age at operation of 55 years (ran
ge, 15 to 81), During the study period, 206 laparoscopic inguinal hern
ia repairs were performed in the 173 patients. Only one patient (0.6%)
required conversion to laparotomy. Bilateral hernia repair was done i
n 31 patients (18%). Of the 206 procedures, 63 repairs (31%) were perf
ormed for recurrent hernias. In 69% of the patients, the procedure was
completed on an outpatient basis, Early postoperative complications n
ecessitating surgical intervention occurred in four patients, The medi
an time to return to work or normal physical activity was 7 days for u
nilateral and 12 days for bilateral hernia repair (P = 0.18), A mean f
ollow-up of 29 months was obtained for 171 patients(99%). In sis patie
nts (3%), a recurrent hernia developed. Four of these six patients had
previously undergone an open surgical procedure on the side of the re
currence. Conclusion: Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy is a feasibl
e alternative to open hernia repair. This operation, however, should b
e reserved for selected patients, Longer follow-up and controlled tria
ls comparing laparoscopic and tension-free open herniorrhaphy are nece
ssary for assessment of the relative benefits of this procedure.