Several assay systems [H-3 radioimmunoassay (RTA) with and without ext
raction; microplate enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA); qualitative ELI
SA (tube test)] were used to measure plasma progesterone concentration
in mare plasma. The direct RIA showed a close correlation (R = 0.94)
with the extraction RIA. The direct RTA and the microplate ELISA were
compared in two different studies. In the first study 1155 samples of
postpartum mares were used for progesterone determination with both as
says. The ELISA resulted in more elevated values both in oestrus and d
ioestrus (0.19 +/- 0.3 and 2.44 +/- 3.62 nmol/l for oestrus, n = 436,
and 8.94 +/- 4.29 and 27.88 +/- 18.34 nmol/l for dioestrus, n = 719, f
or the RTA and ELISA, respectively, R = 0.71). The evaluation of indiv
idual progesterone profiles has revealed that the microplate ELISA det
ects the time of ovulation at the same time as it is determined by the
RIA and clinical examination. The sensitivity and specificity were ca
lculated for different progesterone threshold values. In the second st
udy including 7 non-pregnant, cycling mares the progesterone concentra
tion of 240 samples was determined by both assays. Basal values (Day 0
) obtained with the ELISA were higher (1.57 nmol/l) than those of the
RIA (0.2 nmol/l). Both curves reached the same maximum concentration (
12.11 and 12.45 nmol/l) 5 days after ovulation. The correlation betwee
n the RIA and ELISA values was high (R = 0.90). The tube test was comp
ared to the microplate ELISA as reference using 576 plasma samples of
34 non-pregnant, non-cycling mares included in an ovulation induction
study. Of these samples 118 had higher and 458 had lower values than 3
.18 nmol/l. In most cases the tube test was in complete agreement with
the microplate ELISA. The sensitivity, specificity, + predictive and
- predictive values for the tube test were 79.7%, 95.4%, 81.7% and 94.
8%, respectively.