Phsw. Kulatilake et al., REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCURATE QUANTIFICATION OF SELF-AFFINE ROUGHNESS USING THE VARIOGRAM METHOD, International journal of solids and structures, 35(31-32), 1998, pp. 4167-4189
Both stationary and non-stationary fractional Brownian profiles (self-
affine profiles) with known values of fractal dimension, D, input stan
dard deviation, sigma, and data density, d, were generated. For differ
ent values of the input parameter of the variogram method (lag distanc
e, h), D and another associated fractal parameter ii, were calculated
for the aforementioned profiles. It was found that sigma has no effect
on calculated D. The estimated ii, was found to increase with D, sigm
a and d according to the equation K-v = 2.0 x 10(-5) d(0.35)sigma(0.95
)D(14.5). The parameter K-v seems to have potential to capture the sca
le effect of roughness profiles. Suitable ranges for h were estimated
to obtain computed D within +/- 10% of the D used for the generation a
nd also to satisfy a power functional relation between the variogram a
nd ii. Results indicated the importance of removal of nonstationarity
of profiles to obtain accurate estimates for the fractal parameters. I
t was found that at least two parameters are required to quantify stat
ionary roughness; the parameters D and K-v are suggested for use with
the variogram method. In addition, one or more parameters should be us
ed to quantify the non-stationary part of roughness, if it exists; at
the basic level, the mean inclination/declination angle of the surface
in the direction considered can be used to represent the non-stationa
rity. A new concept of feature size range of a roughness profile is in
troduced in this paper. The feature size range depends on d, D and sig
ma. The suitable h range to use with the variogram method to produce a
ccurate fractal parameter values for a roughness profile was found to
depend on both d and D. It is shown that the feature size range of a r
oughness profile plays an important role in obtaining accurate roughne
ss parameter values with both the divider and the variogram methods. T
he minimum suitable h was found to increase with decreasing d and incr
easing D. Procedures are given in this paper to estimate a suitable h
range for a given natural rock joint profile to use with the variogram
method to estimate D and K-v accurately for the profile. (C) 1998 Els
evier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.