We view each station in a Jackson network as a queue of tasks, of a pa
rticular type, which are to be processed by the associated specialized
server. A complete pooling of queues, into a single queue, and server
s, into a single server, gives rise to an M/PH/1 queue, where the serv
er is flexible in the sense that it processes all tasks. We assess the
value of complete pooling by comparing the steady-state mean sojourn
times of these two systems. The main insight from our analysis is that
care must be used in pooling. Sometimes pooling helps, sometimes it h
urts, and its effect (good or bad) can be unbounded. Also discussed br
iefly are alternative pooling scenarios, for example complete pooling
of only queues which results in an M/PH/S system, or partial pooling w
hich can be devastating enough to turn a stable Jackson network into a
n unstable Bramson network. We conclude with some possible future rese
arch directions.