Ra. Dunn et al., VIDEOTAPE INCREASES PARENT KNOWLEDGE ABOUT POLIOVIRUS VACCINES AND CHOICES OF POLIO VACCINATION SCHEDULES, Pediatrics (Evanston), 102(2), 1998, pp. 261-266
Objective. To study the effect of an educational videotape about polio
virus vaccines and choices of schedules for parents/guardians of child
ren starting the polio vaccination series. Design. Prospective, random
ized trial comparing two educational interventions.Setting. Five pedia
tric offices (two university-based, two health maintenance organizatio
n staff models, and one private practice) and a local health departmen
t immunization clinic in the greater Lansing, MI, area. Participants.
A total of 287 parents/guardians of 2- to 9-month-olds presenting for
well-child care and due for the first set of immunizations including p
oliovirus vaccine. Interventions. Parents/guardians were randomized to
read the vaccine information statement (VIS) alone or to read the VIS
and view a 15-minute videotape about polio vaccination and choices of
schedules produced by Michigan State University. The intervention gro
ups were similar by race/ethnicity, education, and relationship to the
child. Outcome Measures. Change in knowledge about the risk of poliom
yelitis in the United States, transmission of poliomyelitis, character
istics of the two poliovirus vaccines, and choices of polio vaccinatio
n schedules; and parent opinion on effectiveness of the interventions,
as measured by pre- and postintervention questionnaires. Results. Bot
h interventions resulted in increased test scores of knowledge. Howeve
r, videotape viewers scored significantly higher on their posttest com
pared with parents/guardians assigned to VIS only. This significant in
crease was noted across all practice types, two of three major racial/
ethnic groups, and educational levels. (The increase for Hispanic pare
nts/guardians approached significance). Reading the VIS did not improv
e? posttest scores for videotape viewers. Reading the VIS did improve
posttest scores for those assigned. to VIS only, but these scores stil
l were not as high as for videotape viewers who did not read the VIS.
Conclusions. This study demonstrated that a complicated discussion of
risks/benefits of two vaccines and their schedules of administration c
ould be communicated effectively via a videotaped presentation. In add
ition, the videotape was more effective than VIS alone in increasing s
hort-term knowledge, regardless of practice type, race/ethnicity, or e
ducational level. As immunization schedules increase in complexity and
parents are asked to make more choices, videotaped information may be
a better method to achieve the goal of truly informed consent.