As. Alhomoud, GEOTECHNICAL STUDY FOR EVALUATING STABILITY AND RESTORATION WORK AT THE 1,000 YEAR-OLD ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE OF AYLA, GULF OF AQABA, KINGDOM OF JORDAN, Environmental & engineering geoscience, 4(1), 1998, pp. 103-114
Geotechnical Investigations at the site of ancient Ayla in Aqaba, Jord
an, show that soils are predominantly granular, with archaeological fi
ll overlying beach sand, which in turn overlies a coarser sand and gra
vel. Except for the wadi area, ground water occurs about 3 m below the
existing ground level. The bearing capacity of the foundation is 3.5
kg/cm(2) for the dense granular materials that represent the probable
founding layer of the existing walls, and 2.0 kg/cm(2) for the weaker
silty/clayey zone. Back analysis yields a safe wall height of at least
6.0 m. Therefore, no stability problems are present. Tilting and sink
ing were noted in some portions of the exterior malls as a result of d
ynamic lateral earth pressures caused by a major earthquake incident i
n 1067 A.D. Thus, wall-foundation support is recommended during archae
ological excavations; and permanent excavations for exposing the walls
should be limited to about 3 m by the western wall, and about 2.5 m b
y the eastern wall. Stones used in the construction of ancient Ayla co
nsist of precut sandstone, siltstone, mudstone and granite. Weathering
effects were clearly noted on the exposed stones on the walls. The re
placement stone should consist of sandstone blocks located 35 km north
of Aqaba. Wall restoration includes replacement of mortar in the inne
r walls and disintegrated stone pieces in the external walls. Existing
mortars consist primarily of a brown silty mixture and a gray mixture
, but also a mixture of fine gravel, and a lime/gypsum binder. The maj
or chemical constituents of the original mortar are 18 percent SiO2, 2
3 percent CaO, and 34 percent SO3. X-ray diffraction peaks indicate th
e presence of gypsum, calcite and quartz. Comparative analysis data ga
ve 7 percent CaCO3, 53 percent sand, and 40 percent solubles as averag
e values for the constituents. Two sand sources were identified for th
e mortar mix; recommended mortar for restoration was a mix of lime, sa
nd, and ash, with ratios of 1:3:1.5.