Sa. Peterson et al., ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITING - REGIONAL LAKE TROPHIC PATTERNS IN THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED-STATES - 3 APPROACHES, Environmental management, 22(5), 1998, pp. 789-801
During the summers of 1991-1994, the Environmental Monitoring and Asse
ssment Program (EMAP) conducted variable probability sampling on 344 l
akes throughout the northeastern United States. Trophic state data wer
e analyzed for the Northeast as a whole and for each of its three majo
r ecoregions-the Adirondacks (ADI), the New England Uplands (NEU), and
the Coastal Lowland and Plateau (CLP)-and inferred to the entire popu
lation of lakes greater than or equal to 1 ha (N = 11,076). Results we
re compared to a large, nonrandomly sampled data set for the same area
compiled by Rohm and others and contrasted with lake trophic state in
formation published in the National Water Quality Inventory: 1994 Repo
rt to Congress [305(b) report. Lakes across the entire Northeast were
identified by EMAP data as 37.9% (+/-8.4%) oligotrophic, 40.1% (+/-9.7
%) mesotrophic, 12.6% (+/-7.9%) eutrophic, and 9.3% (+/-6.3%) hypereut
rophic. Lakes in the ADI and NEU generally are at a low, nearly identi
cal trophic state (96% oligotrophic/mesotrophic), while those in the C
LP are much richer (45% eutrophic). EMAP results are similar to result
s of the Rohm data set across the entire region. In the CLP, however,
EMAP identified approximately 45% of the lakes as eutrophic/hypereutro
phic, while the Rohm data set identified only 21% in these categories.
Across the entire Northeast, the 305(b) report identified a much high
er proportion (32.2%) or lakes in eutrophic condition and a much small
er proportion (19.8%) in oligotrophic condition than did the EMAP surv
ey data(12.5% +/- 7.9% and 37.9% +/- 8.5%, respectively). Probability
sampling has several advantages over nonrandom sampling when regional
resource condition assessment is the goal.