The rise in the importance of nonstate actors in generating new norms
in world politics has been documented by scholars, but the literature
has focused predominantly on nonsecurity (''new'') issue areas. Conver
sely, although recent constructivist work in international relations h
as examined the security policies of states, typically it is the state
that is doing the constructing of interests. I bridge these two liter
atures by examining the hard case of transnational civil society worki
ng through issue networks to teach state interests in security policy.
I analyze the campaign by transnational civil society to generate an
international norm prohibiting antipersonnel land mines and trace the
effects of several techniques through which states can be said to be s
ocialized. Through generating issues, networking, ''grafting,'' and us
ing a transnational Socratic method to reverse burdens of proof, the c
ampaign has stimulated systemic normative change through two processes
: norm adoption through the conversion of persuaded moral entrepreneur
s and emulation resulting from social pressures of identity.