Background: Since random treatment allocation is hardly understood by
the majority of patients, a new 'nested consent design' for clinical t
rials is proposed. Proposed design: The design consists of a two-step
enrollment of study subjects. The first step is the enrollment of part
icipants into a follow-up study, where consent to be subjects involved
in the follow-up is obtained. The second step is the enrollment of ra
ndomly sampled eligible participants into a new treatment group. After
the explanation of (1) treatment mode, (2) additional burdens associa
ted with the proposed treatment and (3) expected effects and possible
adverse events, written informed consent is obtained. Those who reject
participation and those who are not allocated into the new treatment
are treated by standard care. Endpoints are set to be the same for all
follow-up study participants whether allocated into the new treatment
or not, and follow-up is carried out in the same manner. Analyses are
performed between those allocated to the new treatment and those non-
allocated on an intent-to-treat basis. Example: Although not a clinica
l trial, this design was applied in a smoking cessation program at Aic
hi Cancer Center Hospital for fi rst-visit patients who answered in a
question naire survey that they were smokers. Out of 1330 necessary pa
rticipants, 324 were enrolled in the follow-up study during the first
three months of enrollment. Conclusions: The design was found to be fe
asible for prevention trials, and possibly for clinical trials to comp
are a new treatment with a standard treatment. There seems to be no et
hical difference between this design and the one-arm study design.