THE EFFICACY OF INTRATHECAL NEOSTIGMINE, INTRATHECAL MORPHINE, AND THEIR COMBINATION FOR POSTCESAREAN SECTION ANALGESIA

We designed this study to evaluate the postoperative analgesic efficac y and safety of intrathecal Fl neostigmine, IT morphine, and their com bination in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthes ia. Seventy-nine term parturients were randomly divided into four grou ps to receive isotonic sodium chloride solution 0.2 mL, neostigmine 25 mu g, morphine 100 mu g, or the combination of IT neostigmine 12.5 mu g and morphine 50 mu g with IT 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 12 mg. The re were no significant differences among the four groups with regard t o spinal anesthesia, maternal blood pressure and heart rate, or fetal status. Postoperative analgesia was provided by IV patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using fentanyl and ketorolac. Compared with the saline group, the time to first PCA use was significantly longer in the neos tigmine group (P < 0.001), with lower 24-h analgesic consumption (P < 0.001). Nausea and vomiting were the most common side effects of IT ne ostigmine (73.7%). Analgesic effectiveness was similar between the neo stigmine and morphine groups. Compared with the neostigmine group, the combination group had significantly prolonged analgesic effect and re duced 24-h PCA consumption (P < 0.05) with less severity of nausea and vomiting (P = 0.058). Compared with the morphine group, the combinati on group tended to have prolonged times to first PCA use (P = 0.054) w ith a lower incidence of pruritus (P < 0.03). Implications: Intratheca l (IT) neostigmine 25 mu g produced postoperative analgesia for cesare an section similar to that of IT morphine 100 mu g, but with a high in cidence of nausea and vomiting. The combination of IT neostigmine 12.5 mu g and IT morphine 50 mu g may produce better postoperative analges ia with fewer side effects than IT neostigmine 25 mu g or TT morphine 100 mu g alone.