W. Nieuwland et al., TRAINING EFFECTS ON PEAK (VO2)-O-CENTER-DOT, SPECIFIC OF THE MODE OF MOVEMENT, IN REHABILITATION OF PATIENTS WITH CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE, International journal of sports medicine, 19(5), 1998, pp. 358-363
Training effects on peak oxygen consumption ((V) over dot O-2), specif
ic to the mode of movement, are well-known in exercise training of you
ng, healthy adults. However, these specific training effects were neve
r studied in patients with coronary artery disease, but may be importa
nt in the evaluation of training effects of cardiac rehabilitation pro
grams. Exercise training programs dominated by, for example, cycling m
ight improve peak (V) over dot O-2, measured during cycling, more than
during treadmill testing. Therefore, the effects of an exercise train
ing program dominated by cycling and of a program with both cycling an
d walking/jogging during a 6-weeks cardiac rehabilitation program were
evaluated on both cycle ergometer and treadmill. Male patients (aged
between 35 and 70 years) with coronary artery disease (history of myoc
ardial infarction and/or angina pectoris and/or coronary artery bypass
surgery) were randomly assigned to either a program dominated by cycl
ing (Group I: n = 18, mean age 53 +/- 6.7) or a program with both cycl
ing and jogging (Group II: n = 20, mean age 48 +/- 9.1). Before and af
ter the program peak (V) over dot O-2 was measured on both cycle ergom
eter and treadmill. At baseline peak (V) over dot O-2 on treadmill was
significantly greater than on cycle ergometer in both groups. Peak (V
) over dot O-2 (both cycle and treadmill) increased highly significant
ly during both programs; in group I the increase of peak (V) over dot
O-2 on cycle ergometer was greater than on treadmill (respectively, 28
.1% versus 18.8%; p<0.05), in contrast to group II (respectively, 22.8
% and 16.6%; n.s.). As a result, the difference between peak (V) over
dot O-2 an treadmill and cycle ergometer decreased significantly more
during the program in group I (p<0.05). These results suggest specific
training effects in patients with coronary artery disease and should
be considered outcome assessment and exercise prescription of cardiac
rehabilitation programs.