Rh. Jacobson, VALIDATION OF SEROLOGICAL ASSAYS FOR DIAGNOSIS OF INFECTIOUS-DISEASES, Revue scientifique et technique - Office international des epizooties, 17(2), 1998, pp. 469-486
Assay validation is a series of the following interrelated processes:
an experimental process: reagents and protocols are optimised by exper
imentation to detect the analyte with accuracy and precision, and to e
nsure repeatability and reproducibility in the assay a relative proces
s: its diagnostic sensitivity and diagnostic specificity are calculate
d relative to test results obtained from reference animal populations
of known infection/exposure status a conditional process: classificati
on of animals in the target population as infected or uninfected is co
nditional upon how well the reference animal population used to valida
te the assay represents the population to which the assay will be appl
ied (accurate predictions of the infection status of animals from test
results and predictive values of positive and negative test results a
re conditional upon the estimated prevalence of disease/infection in t
he target population) an incremental process: confidence in the validi
ty of an assay increases over time when use confirms that it is robust
as demonstrated by accurate and precise results (the assay may also a
chieve increasing levels of validity as it is upgraded and extended by
adding reference populations of known infection status) a continuous
process: the assay remains valid only insofar as the assay continues t
o provide accurate and precise results as proved through statistical v
erification. Therefore, validation of diagnostic assays for infectious
diseases does not end with a time-limited series of experiments based
on a few reference samples. Rather, it is a process that also require
s constant vigilance and maintenance, along with reassessment of its p
erformance characteristics for each population of animals to which it
is applied. It is certain that the current movement to develop and imp
lement accreditation criteria for veterinary diagnostic laboratories m
ay be of little worth unless there is some assurance that the assays c
onducted in such laboratories are properly validated. Fully accredited
laboratories may generate highly reproducible test results, but the r
esults may still misclassify animals as to their infection status due
to an improper assay validation process. Therefore, assay validation i
s foundational to the core product of veterinary diagnostic laboratori
es - test results and their interpretation.