Suction dredging for gold in river channels is a small-scale mining pr
actice whereby streambed material is sucked up a pipe, passed over a s
luice box to sort out the gold, and discarded as tailings over another
area of bed. Natural resource managers should be concerned about suct
ion dredging because it is common in streams in western North America
that contain populations of sensitive aquatic species. It also is subj
ect to both state and federal regulations, and has provided the basis
for litigation. The scientific literature contains few peer-reviewed s
tudies of the effects of dredging, but knowledge of dredging practices
, and the biology and physics of streams suggests a variety of mechani
sms linking dredging to aquatic resources. Effects of dredging commonl
y appear to be minor and local, but natural resource professionals sho
uld expect effects to vary widely among stream systems and reaches wit
hin systems. Fishery managers should be especially concerned when dred
ging coincides with the incubation of embryos in stream gravels or pre
cedes spawning runs soon followed by high flows. We recommend that man
agers carefully analyze each watershed so regulations can be tailored
to particular issues and effects. Such analyses are part of a strategy
to (1) evaluate interactions between suction dredging and other activ
ities and resources; (2) use this information to regulate dredging and
other activities; (3) monitor implementation of regulations and on- a
nd off-site effects of dredging; and (4) adapt management strategies a
nd regulations according to new information. Given the current level o
f uncertainty about the effects of dredging, where threatened or endan
gered aquatic species inhabit dredged areas, fisheries managers would
be prudent to suspect that dredging is harmful to aquatic resources.