Purpose: The second-generation oral anticancer agent UFT, a combinatio
n of uracil and tegafur (TGF), results in a higher fluorouracil (5-FU)
concentration in the tumor tissues than is achieved by TGF or compara
ble doses of intravenous 5-fluorouracil. UFT has been extensively stud
ied in Japan and has been in use in the Orient for many years, particu
larly for patients with gastric carcinoma. UFT has recently entered ex
tensive investigations in North America and Europe. Methods: Relevant
studies that have chronicled the establishment of UFT, its mechanism o
f action, preclinical toxicology, human pharmacokinetics, phase I stud
ies, and activity against gastric carcinoma are described in detail. R
esults: The uracil in UFT slows degradation of 5-FU by dihydropyrimidi
ne dehydrogenase (DPD), which results in sustained concentrations of 5
-FU in blood and tumor tissues, UFT is well tolerated, but such toxic
effects as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea are dose- and schedule-depen
dent. In phase I pharmacokinetic studies, UFT given orally on a 28-day
schedule resulted in blood concentrations comparable to those followi
ng low-dose continuous intravenous infusion of 5-FU. In patients with
gastric carcinoma, UFT alone has a response rate of approximately 20%.
In the adjuvant setting, UFT plus mitomycin appears superior to TOF p
lus mitomycin. In Japan, UFT is part of the standard adjuvant chemothe
rapy for gastric carcinoma, Conclusion: UFT is one of the first second
-generation oral 5-FU prodrugs under investigation in North America an
d Europe. The literature suggests UFT is well tolerated and has cellul
ar pharmacokinetic superiority over the first-generation 5-FU prodrug
TGF. UFT has a more favorable toxicity profile than intravenous 5-FU,
The issues of efficacy, patient convenience, and quality of life need
to be studied in controlled randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 16:2877-28
85, (C) 1998 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.