Dk. Biswas et al., CLASSIFICATION OF BREAST-CANCER CELLS ON THE BASIS OF A FUNCTIONAL ASSAY FOR ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR, Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.), 4(7), 1998, pp. 454-467
Citations number
55
Categorie Soggetti
Biology,"Medicine, Research & Experimental","Cell Biology
Background: The receptor (ER) for estrogen (E2) is routinely assayed a
s a marker to determine the feasibility of anti-hormone therapy agains
t breast cancer because ER-positive (ER+) tumors are much more likely
to respond to anti-hormone therapy than are ER-negative (ER-). However
40% of ER+ breast cancer patients do not respond to anti-hormone ther
apy. We suggest that this unpredictability of therapeutic responses li
es in the current ER assays, which measure only an initial component o
f the E2-responsive pathway, and that the difference depends upon alte
red downstream processes. We propose a functional criterion that subcl
assifies breast cancers on the basis of specific binding of ER to its
cognate DNA sequence, the estrogen response element (ERE). Materials a
nd Methods: ER was identified in breast cancer cell lines by immunoflu
orescence assay, Western blot analysis, identification of ER-specific
mRNA, and by interaction of the ER-ERE complex with three different ER
-specific antibodies. ER-ERE complex formation was measured by electro
phoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA). Transactivation of the E2-respon
sive gene was studied by transfection of cells with fusion gene constr
uct with the promoter-containing ERE sequence and assay of reporter ge
ne activity in the cell extracts. Results: The growth of ER+ T47D cell
s was sensitive to tamoxifen, ICI-182,780, and ethynyl estradiol (EE2)
, whereas another ER+ breast cancer cell line, 21PT, was resistant to
these compounds. The estrogen receptor (ER) in the nuclear extracts of
MCF-7 and T47D demonstrated hormone-dependent interaction with the re
sponse element (ERE) and also downstream transactivation of the E2-res
ponsive PS2 promoter. But in the 21PT cell line that was designated as
ER- on the basis of ligand-binding assay and was found to be ER+ by a
ll the other ER assays, ER-ERE interaction and PS2 promoter transactiv
ation were independent of hormone. Conclusions: On the basis of the do
wnstream functional assay of ER interaction with ERE, ER+ breast tumor
cells can be subclassified into two categories. The first is E2-depen
dent (ERd+) and these cells should respond to anti-hormone therapy. Th
e second type of ER interacts with ERE independent of E2 (ERi+) and co
nstitutively transactivates responsive genes. It is predicted that the
latter type of breast cancers will not respond to antihormone therapy
.