M. Salaris et S. Cassisi, A NEW ANALYSIS OF THE RED GIANT BRANCH TIP DISTANCE SCALE AND THE VALUE OF THE HUBBLE CONSTANT, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 298(1), 1998, pp. 166-178
The theoretical evaluations of the red giant branch tip (TRGB) luminos
ity presented previously by Salaris & Cassisi are extended to higher m
etallicities, and compared with analogous independent results recently
published, The present sets of stellar models agree quite well in the
determination of the TRGB brightness, Relations between TRGB bolometr
ic and I (Cousins) magnitude and zero-age horizontal branch (ZAHB) V m
agnitude with respect to the metallicity are provided by adopting empi
rical, semi-empirical and theoretical evaluations of bolometric correc
tions, after a careful calibration of the zero-point of the bolometric
correction scales. The comparison between our ZAHB and TRGB distance
scales for galactic globular clusters presented in Paper I is now supp
lemented with a comparison with the Hipparcos distance scale set by lo
cal subdwarfs with accurate parallax determinations. The overall agree
ment between ZAHB and Hipparcos distances is quite good. The TRGB dist
ances for globular clusters are compatible with the ZAHB distances in
the limit of the small sample of red giants observed. The ZAHB and TRG
B distances to resolved galaxies are in good agreement, whereas the co
mparison between TRGB and Cepheid distances, computed by using the cal
ibration suggested earlier by Madore & Freedman, reveals a systematic
discrepancy of the order of 0.12 mag. The TRGB distances are systemati
cally longer in comparison with the Cepheid ones. This result supports
the case for a revision of the zero-point of the Cepheid distance sca
le, as already suggested by other authors on the basis of Hipparcos pa
rallaxes. We do not find any clear correlation of the difference betwe
en TRGB and Cepheid distances with metal content. The application of o
ur TRGB distance scale to NGC 3379 provides a distance to the Leo I gr
oup that is about 8 per cent higher than the one obtained recently by
Sakai et al, adopting the TRGB-metallicity calibration by Lee, Freedma
n & Madore, Our distance to the Leo I group, coupled with recent indep
endent determinations of the Coma cluster-Leo I distance, obtained dif
ferentially by means of secondary distance indicators, provides a dete
rmination of H-0 at the Coma cluster in the range H-0 = 60 +/- 11 km s
(-1) Mpc(-1). For choices of Omega in agreement with the observations
(0.3 less than or equal to Omega less than or equal to 1) and cosmolog
ical constant equal to zero, our derived H-0 value is compatible with
the most recent determinations of galactic globular cluster ages, thus
removing the long-standing conflict between the Hubble age and the ag
e of the oldest stars in the Galaxy.