Jl. Soulages, CHEMICAL DENATURATION - POTENTIAL IMPACT OF UNDETECTED INTERMEDIATES IN THE FREE-ENERGY OF UNFOLDING AND M-VALUES OBTAINED FROM A 2-STATE ASSUMPTION, Biophysical journal, 75(1), 1998, pp. 484-492
The chemical unfolding transition of a protein was simulated, includin
g the presence of an intermediate (I) in equilibrium with the native (
N) and unfolded (U) states. The calculations included free energies of
unfolding, Delta G(u)(w), in the range of 1.4 kcal/mol to 10 kcal/mol
and three different global m-values. The simulations included a broad
range of equilibrium constants for the N <-> I process. The dependenc
e of the N <-> I equilibrium on the concentration of denaturant was al
so included in the simulations. Apparent Delta G(u)(w) and m-values we
re obtained from the simulated unfolding transitions by fitting the da
ta to a two-state unfolding process. The potential-errors were calcula
ted for two typical experimental situations: 1) the unfolding is monit
ored by a physical property that does not distinguish between native a
nd intermediate states (case 1), and 2) the physical property does not
distinguish between intermediate and unfolded states (case II). The r
esults obtained indicated that in the presence of an intermediate, and
in both experimental situations, the free energy of unfolding and the
m-values could be largely underestimated. The errors in Delta G(u)(w)
and m-values do not depend on the m-values that characterize the glob
al N <-> U transition. They are dependent on the equilibrium constant
for the N <-> I transition and its characteristic m(1)-value. The exte
nt of the underestimation increases for higher energies of unfolding.
Including no random error in the simulations, it was estimated that th
e underestimation in Delta G(u)(w) could range between 25% and 35% for
unfolding transitions of 3-10 kcal/mol (case I). In case II, the unde
restimation in Delta G(u)(w) could be even larger than in case I. In t
he same energy range, a 50% error in the m-value could also take place
. The fact that most of the mutant proteins are characterized by both
a lower m-value and a lower stability than the wild-type protein sugge
sts that in some cases the results could have been underestimated due
to the application of the two-state assumption.