ADENOID BASAL EPITHELIOMAS OF THE UTERINE CERVIX - A REEVALUATION OF DISTINCTIVE CERVICAL BASALOID LESIONS CURRENTLY CLASSIFIED AS ADENOID BASAL CARCINOMA AND ADENOID BASAL HYPERPLASIA
Ja. Brainard et Wr. Hart, ADENOID BASAL EPITHELIOMAS OF THE UTERINE CERVIX - A REEVALUATION OF DISTINCTIVE CERVICAL BASALOID LESIONS CURRENTLY CLASSIFIED AS ADENOID BASAL CARCINOMA AND ADENOID BASAL HYPERPLASIA, The American journal of surgical pathology, 22(8), 1998, pp. 965-975
A series of 12 adenoid basal carcinomas and three adenoid basal hyperp
lasias of the cervix were analyzed. The ages of the patients with aden
oid basal carcinoma ranged from 30 to 91 years with a mean of 71 years
. Pap smear results for 11 of 12 (92%) were abnormal. Almost all patie
nts were asymptomatic. None had a gross cervical tumor. All tumors had
typical histologic features of adenoid basal carcinoma, with various
degrees of squamous differentiation. Depth of tumor invasion ranged fr
om 2 mm to 10 mm (mean, 4.3 mm; median, 3.7 mm), exceeding 3 mm in six
tumors (50%). Tumor volume was >500 mm(3) in four tumors (33%). An as
sociated neoplastic squamous lesion was present in 92% of patients, in
cluding high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in 10 cases and
microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma in one. Treatment was predominan
tly surgical, usually after some form of cervical conization; conizati
on alone was performed in three patients. Lymph nodes were removed in
five patients; none of 104 nodes had metastases. No recurrence of tumo
r developed in any patient. Nine patients were alive without disease a
fter 4 to 82 months (mean: 30 months), and three died without disease
after 24, 63, and 87 months. The three patients with adenoid basal hyp
erplasia also were asymptomatic and did not have a gross cervical lesi
on. Pap smear results for two patients were abnormal. The adenoid basa
l hyperplasias were incidental, very superficial lesions that resemble
d small adenoid basal carcinomas. Generally, they were attached to the
squamous or endocervical mucosal epi thelium; all were less than 0.5
mm in depth. Treatment was hysterectomy in one patient and conization
in two. Follow-up was short but uneventful. Our findings, together wit
h those previously reported. indicate (1) adenoid basal carcinoma with
typical histologic features is not a malignant neoplasm in that it ty
pically presents in asymptomatic women, usually is discovered after an
abnormal Pap smear result due to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,
does not produce a grossly visible lesion: has never metastasized to r
egional lymph nodes or elsewhere, and has never itself caused death; (
2) rare, histologically atypical tumors with distinctly malignant feat
ures should not be regarded as adenoid basal carcinoma; and (3) adenoi
d basal hyperplasia probably is a small adenoid basal carcinoma. We pr
opose the term ''adenoid basal epithelioma'' to replace adenoid basal
carcinoma and adenoid basal hyperplasia, because it better describes t
he clinicopathologic features of these distinctive lesions and their e
xcellent prognosis and may reduce the Likelihood of unnecessarily aggr
essive treatment.