Jp. Suppola et al., COMPARISON OF RISK-FACTORS AND OUTCOME IN PATIENTS WITH ENTEROCOCCUS-FAECALIS VS ENTEROCOCCUS-FAECIUM BACTEREMIA, Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases, 30(2), 1998, pp. 153-157
The purpose of our study was to determine retrospectively the risk fac
tors for the acquisition of Enterococcus faecalis vs E. faecium bacter
aemia, as well as the clinical outcomes of these patients. 62 patients
with Enterococcus faecalis bacteraemia were compared to 31 patients,
with E. faecium bacteraemia. Haematologic malignancies, neutropenia, h
igh-risk source and previous use of aminoglycosides, carbapenems, ceph
alosporins and clindamycin were significantly associated with E. faeci
um bacteraemia, instead, urinary catheterization was found to be relat
ed to Enterococcus faecalis bacteraemia. The mortality rates within 7
d and 30 d were 13% and 27%, respectively, in patients with E. faecali
s bacteraemia and 6% and 29%, respectively, in patients with E. faeciu
m bacteraemia. There was no difference in mortality between E. faecali
s and E. faecium bacteraemia, nor was there a difference in seriousnes
s of disease at the time of bacteraemia. In the subgroups of patients
with monomicrobial or clinically significant E. faecalis vs E, faecium
bacteraemia, the mortality rates were similar to the results of all s
ubjects. Our results do not support the theory that E, faecium would b
e a more virulent organism than E. faecalis.