The use of line-transect methodology, on foot or from a helicopter, is
likely to return the most repeatable, least biased estimates of kanga
roo density. However, the associated costs make both methods impractic
al for broad-scale surveys. For these, a fixed-wing aircraft remains t
he most cost-effective platform. Limitations of the standard fixed-win
g method (200-m strip transects) are well known, but it continues to b
e used because it provides an index of trends, because there are now l
ong runs of data (almost 20 years in some cases) collected in this sta
ndard form and an alternative method is lacking. In this study, four v
ariations of fixed-wing surveys of kangaroos were investigated: two li
ne-transect methods (involving different scanning techniques), the sta
ndard 200-m strip transect and a 100-m strip transect. Surveys using t
hese methods were compared with helicopter line-transect surveys along
the same flight lines in three areas (5000-7500 km(2)) in western Que
ensland. Both fixed-wing line-transect methods failed to produce consi
stently accurate estimates of density for all three species surveyed:
red kangaroos (Macropus rufus), eastern grey kangaroos (M. giganteus)
and common wallaroos (M. robustus). While generally more accurate than
the uncorrected strip-transect counts, they were no less variable. Ho
wever, the strip-transect counts still need to be corrected for bias f
or which this study offers revised estimates of correction factors for
eastern grey kangaroos (3.7-10.2) and common wallaroos (3.8-4.1), and
estimates for red kangaroos (1.7-2.7) that support currently used val
ues. An attractive alternative is to survey in 100-m strip transects,
which offer improved visibility (correction factors of 1.0-1.8 for red
kangaroos, 2.1-3.6 for eastern grey kangaroos and 1.7-2.1 for common
wallaroos) and are therefore likely to be more accurate and repeatable
. However, these advantages need to be assessed in relation to continu
ing long runs of data using the standard 200-m strip transect. Correct
ion factors for wallaroos are conservative as helicopter-based density
estimates are known to be underestimates. Further work is needed to a
ssess the generality of correction factors, both spatially and tempora
lly.