Since 1990, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) has publis
hed a series of annual Human Development Reports (HDRs) in which the h
uman development index (HDI) is computed for each country. This index
has become an important alternative to the traditional unidimensional
measure of development (i.e. the gross domestic product). Although the
index still fails to include any ecological considerations, it has br
oadened the discussion surrounding the evaluation of development. Unfo
rtunately, over the years, the HDRs seem to have become stagnant, repe
ating the same rhetoric without necessarily increasing the HDI's utili
ty. This paper evaluates how well these reports have lived up to their
own conceptual mandate and assesses the ability of the HDI to further
the development debate. We find that the reports have lost touch with
their original vision and the index fails to capture the essence of t
he world it seeks to portray. In addition, the index focuses almost ex
clusively on national performance and ranking, but does not pay much a
ttention to development from a global perspective. We propose the inco
rporation of three simple modifications for the index as a first step
to overcome these shortcomings. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rig
hts reserved.