This article is a contribution to the debate over Asia's economic cris
is. In particular it explores the actions and motives of one of the ke
y actors in the Asian crash-the International Monetary Fund. The artic
le demonstrates that the IMF does not have a monopoly of social or eco
nomic wisdom (far from it). If the Fund's neoliberal crusaders can be
reined in, and alternatives explored, the crisis can offer Asia the ch
ance to forge democratic and sustainable alternatives to the ruinous d
evelopment path of recent years. If not, then ordinary Asians could co
me to look back on the 1970s and 1980s as a golden era. That would ind
eed be a tragic testament to the failings of the 'rescue packages' of
1997.