Although economists usually support the unrestricted entry of firms in
to an industry, entry may lower social welfare if there are setup cost
s or if entrants have a cost disadvantage. We consider the welfare eff
ects of entry within a standard Cournot model where some of an incumbe
nt firm's costs are sunk. We find that the range of parameter values o
ver which entry can harm welfare declines monotonically in the fractio
n of cost that are sunk. Furthermore, the presence of even a small fra
ction of sunk costs often reverses an assessment that entry harms welf
are.