L. Iseler, PILOTED SIMULATOR INVESTIGATION OF CATEGORY-A CIVIL ROTORCRAFT TERMINAL AREA COCKPIT DISPLAYS, Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 43(3), 1998, pp. 185-194
A piloted simulation experiment was conducted in the NASA Ames Researc
h Center Vertical Motion Simulator as a preliminary investigation of t
he use of integrated cockpit displays in terminal area operations for
Category A civil rotorcraft. Category A is the transport category of r
otorcraft which are required to be able to recover from an engine fail
ure and continue flying. A UH-60 Black Hawk model was used for the sim
ulation, with modifications made to the power available to simulate a
civil rotorcraft. Hovering backups were flown from a confined area, ra
ised vertiport site to a takeoff decision point (TDP), followed by nor
mal flyout. Pilots flew the task with the standard Black Hawk instrume
nt set or with one of two integrated formats presented on a color, pan
el-mounted display. Engine failures were randomly inserted slightly be
fore and slightly after the TDP. The pilot was instructed to make a vi
sual landback to the pad when an engine failed prior to reaching the T
DP and to continue the flyout when an engine failed after passing thro
ugh the TDP. Weather conditions were varied from calm, clear condition
s to low visibility and ceilings, with crosswinds and turbulence. Eval
uations were conducted with seven pilots. Objective and subjective dat
a describing task performance and pilot workload were collected. It wa
s hypothesized that even without the benefit of display assistance, pi
lots would achieve better performance handling an engine failure by us
ing integrated displays during the ah-engines-operating back up phase
prior to the engine failure occurring. As expected, the pilots were ab
le to maintain more precise night path control during the backup with
the integrated display. This precise control, in turn, placed the pilo
t in a better situation from which to handle an engine failure. Pilot
recognition of the TDP location was also highly improved with an integ
rated display. Emergency landbacks, on runs using the integrated displ
ay during the backup portion, were all performed within the specified
tolerances. Some of the landbacks using the standard instrument set, h
owever, exceeded the adequate performance parameters. Cooper-Harper Ha
ndling Qualities Ratings confirmed that pilot workload was reduced and
pilots were able to fly more consistently within the desired performa
nce parameters with the integrated display than with the standard inst
ruments and visual cues.