N. Nair et al., DOES RENAL DAMAGE OCCUR AFTER THE ADMINISTRATION OF P-32 FOR PALLIATION OF PAIN FROM SKELETAL METASTASES, Nuclear medicine communications, 19(7), 1998, pp. 689-693
In normal adults, the maintenance of phosphate balance involves the re
absorption of 85-90% of filtered phosphate by the proximal tubule. Al
a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 125 ml min(-1) and a plasma phos
phate concentration of 1.3 mmol l(-1), the filtered phosphate is appro
ximately 235 mmol day(-1). Following intravenous administration 25-50%
of P-32 is excreted over 4-6 days in normal subjects. In spite of suc
h extensive renal handling of phosphate and, therefore, of P-32, there
are no data in the literature concerning possible P-32-related nephro
toxicity. Adult dosimetry values for the kidney after P-32 are reporte
d as 4.8 rad mCi(-1) h(-1) (0.048 mSev 37 MBq(-1) h(-1)). The entry cr
iteria for P-32 therapy insist on a normal serum creatinine value, ref
lecting awareness of potential renal damage. To answer the fundamental
question of whether there is demonstrable renal damage after P-32, We
undertook serial measurements of GFR in patients given P-32 for treat
ment of pain from skeletal metastases. Twenty-one patients who had nor
mal pre-treatment renal function as shown by normal serum creatinine v
alues were administered P-32 orally in doses ranging from 277.5 to 466
.2 MBq, with a mean of 425.5 MBq. Pre-treatment, GFR was estimated wit
h Tc-99(m)-diethylenetriamine pentaacetate renography using the Gates
protocol. Post-treatment, GFR was estimated serially as far as possibl
e, at weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 and then every 4 weeks for another 3 months,
at which Feint follow-up ceased. Serum creatinine was assessed pre-tr
eatment and every 2 weeks until the end of follow-up, in addition to a
ll other parameters and a clinical evaluation. Mean pro-treatment GFR
was 87.5 ml min(-1), with a range of 48.7-110 ml min(-1). Not all pati
ents could fulfil the entire follow-up schedule as designed, but we ob
tained a minimum of four follow-up tests, two before and two after 4 w
eeks post-treatment. GFR fell to 72% of the pre-therapy value during t
he first 4 weeks following therapy By the sixteenth week, however, the
mean value had returned to or exceeded the pre-treatment value. There
was no change in serum creatinine values. At a time when multiple the
rapies are being considered, this early depression of GFR may be of im
portance. A closer assessment of altered renal function may be warrant
ed and other sensitive tests of renal damage like microalbuminuria cou
ld be used. ((C) 1998 Lippincott-Raven Publishers).