Study Objective: To determine the utility of the laryngeal mask airway
(LMA) in an ambulatory surgery practice. Design: Prospective, longitu
dinal device (survival) study. Setting: University-based ambulatory su
rgery center. Patients: 1,831 ASA physical status I, II, and III outpa
tients undergoing superficial ambulatory surgery procedures. Intervent
ions: Twenty LMA devices were entered into sen,ice over a 2-year perio
d and the number of uses, as well as the structural integrity, were as
sessed at the end of this study period. The serial number on, each LMA
device was used to track the number of times it runs autoclaved, as w
ell as the date that the device failed any of the standardized pre-use
tests or was lost. Measurements and Main Results: During the 2-year s
urvey, 6,430 general anesthetics were administered at the ambulatory s
urgery center, with 1,831 (28%) using an LMA device for airway managem
ent. At the end of the study period, nine devices were still in use, t
hree had been withdrawn for structural analysis by the manufacturer (a
fter > 100 uses), three failed the pre-use test (after 35-82 uses), an
d five devices were lost (after 21-162 uses). The structural examinati
on revealed that the tubes were 50% weaker; however, the cuffs, pilot
balloons, and values were functioning normally. The median (range) num
ber of uses was 92 (21-195). Thus, the 20 LMA devices evaluated tolera
ted an average of 92 autoclave cycles each over the 2-year observation
period. Conclusions: To optimize the use of the LMA device in the amb
ulatory setting it is necessary to increase awareness that it is a non
disposable piece of equipment and to adhere to the manufacturer's inst
ructions for cleaning sterilization, and insertion.