There is a growing trend today which calls for reconstructing the loss
of bigger bone parts in the area of extremities in a suitable manner.
The microvascular bone transplantation for bridging bone defects is -
admist other procedures - a distinct enrichment to preserve the extre
mities. This method of transplantation has the capability of surviving
within a weakened transplant bed. Because of this capability one inev
itably wants to know the criteria which determine the biological behav
iour of the transplants. Furthermore, it is essential to know how this
criteria can be best managed, considering the different indications a
nd locations. The bone healing and bone hypertrophy of 81 patients who
received vascularised bone transplantations have been examined with r
espect to different parameters. As the positive capacities of the vita
l transplants are almost exclusively dependent on the actual supply wi
th blood, angiography have been undertaken during three months after s
urgery. 71 patients with a patent anastomosis after surgery have been
evaluated. Differences in bone healing of the vascularised transplants
have been observed in regard to the following parameter: - The tumor
group showed a better rate of bone healing than those patients with tr
auma and congenital tibiapseudarthrosis. - The bone healing results of
the group of younger patients were better than those of the group of
older patients. Moreover the transplants without a history of infectio
n were better compared with transplants with a history of infection. C
lear differences of the fibula hypertrophy behaviour have been observe
d with respect to the following parameters: upper extremities < lower
extremities, thigh < lower leg, longer transplants < shorter transplan
ts, group of older patients (35-60 years) < group of younger patients
(1-18 years), plates < screws.