SERUM-ALBUMIN AND COLLOID OSMOTIC-PRESSURE IN SURVIVORS AND NONSURVIVORS OF PROLONGED CRITICAL ILLNESS

Citation
Mc. Blunt et al., SERUM-ALBUMIN AND COLLOID OSMOTIC-PRESSURE IN SURVIVORS AND NONSURVIVORS OF PROLONGED CRITICAL ILLNESS, Anaesthesia, 53(8), 1998, pp. 755-761
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00032409
Volume
53
Issue
8
Year of publication
1998
Pages
755 - 761
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-2409(1998)53:8<755:SACOIS>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
We retrospectively compared the changes in serum albumin concentration and colloid osmotic pressure between survivors and nonsurvivors of pr olonged (greater than or equal to 7 days) critical illness over a 2-ye ar period from 1. July 1995. All patients had serum albumin measured d aily, and colloid osmotic pressure measured 5 days a week, throughout their ICU admission. They received crystalloid and colloid infusions a s well as parenteral or enteral feeding. Infusions of albumin were not used to treat hypoalbuminaemia. One hundred and forty-five patients w ere included, 66 nonsurvivors and 79 survivors. Nonsurvivors were sign ificantly older than survivors [mean (95% CI): 58 (3.8) and 49 (4.1) y ears, respectively] and had a greater risk of death [mean (95% CI): 0. 44 (0.06) and 0.28 (0.05); p < 0.05]. There was no significant differe nce in gender, APACHE II score [mean (95% CI): 22 (2.7) (nonsurvivors) ; 18 (2.3) (survivors)] or length of stay [median (interquartile range ): 14 (9-27) days (nonsurvivors); 15 (9-26) days (survivors)]. There w as no difference between the two groups in the absolute minimum serum albumin concentrations reached, the time to reach that minimum or the minimum in the first 7 days. However, nonsurvivors had a significantly lower mean serum albumin concentration: [mean (95% CI): 15.7 (5.1) g. l(-1) compared with 18.3 (4.6) g.l(-1) in survivors; p < 0.05]. They a lso had a lower recovery mean (the weighted mean after the minimum val ue): [mean (95% CI): 13.3 (5.1) g.l(-1) (nonsurvivors) and 18.6 (5.3) g.l(-1) (survivors); p < 0.01]. Analysis of colloid osmotic pressure r esults showed no difference between the groups in mean, minimum or rec overy mean. Regression analysis of mean colloid osmotic pressure and a lbumin revealed that albumin only contributed 17% of the colloid osmot ic pressure in these patients. The similar decrease in albumin in nons urvivors and survivors may reflect the acute inflammatory response and /or haemodilution. However, survivors showed an ability to increase se rum albumin concentrations, possibly owing to resumption of synthesis. The colloid osmotic pressure varied little between or within either g roup of patients, possibly because of the use of artificial colloids. There was no relationship between death and colloid osmotic pressure.