Background: The need for cardiopulmonary bypass in the treatment of pe
netrating heart injuries is debated. Objectives: To review our experie
nce with penetrating heart injuries and determine the indications and
outcome for cardiopulmonary bypass. Design: Retrospective review. Sett
ing: A university-based, level I trauma center. Patients: All victims
of penetrating heart injury presenting between July 1, 1989, and Decem
ber 31, 1995. Methods;: Medical records were reviewed for demographic
and physiological data, operative findings, and outcome. Results: Over
all survival for 106 patients with penetrating heart injury was 55%. I
n an effort to resuscitate the heart, 4 patients with unresponsive car
diogenic shock were placed on cardiopulmonary bypass; none survived. O
f 30 patients with multiple-chamber injuries, 11 presented with signs
of life and 7 survived. Cardiopulmonary bypass was essential to repair
complex injuries in 2 of the 7 survivors. Conclusion: Cardiopulmonary
bypass was ineffective in salvaging patients with cardiogenic shock b
ut was essential in some patients with complex multiple-chamber cardia
c injuries that could not be exposed and repaired by other means.