Objective: To assess the effectiveness of replantation in the treatmen
t of nasal amputations. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: A
university medical center. Results: In no case did the replant surviv
e completely, and in all cases revision surgery was required. However,
in all cases, the resulting deformity was less than the original defe
ct. In our pediatric patients, reconstruction with cartilage grafting
and a midline forehead flap was successful and demonstrated proportion
ate and appropriate growth. Conclusions: It is our belief that replant
ation serves many therapeutic functions. At the very least, there is t
he psychological/emotional factor that is involved in attempting to re
place a native body part that has been severed. Also, it is difficult
to persuade parents and patients that the amputated tissue that has be
en handled with kid gloves by paramedics, maintaining its pink ''alive
'' color, is ultimately doomed to failure. Forehead flaps and conchal
cartilage grafts are more willingly accepted after a ''failed'' replan
tation than as primary reconstructions. In every instance, we believe,
the ultimate defect will be smaller than the original deformity. Cert
ainly, the need for vestibular lining reconstruction is far less. Thus
, the ultimate healed defect from the replantation greatly facilitates
final nasal reconstruction.