R. Rutledge et al., ILLNESS SEVERITY ADJUSTMENT FOR OUTCOMES ANALYSIS - VALIDATION OF THEICISS METHODOLOGY IN ALL 821,455 PATIENTS HOSPITALIZED IN NORTH-CAROLINA IN 1996, Surgery, 124(2), 1998, pp. 187-194
Background. Previous work has demonstrated that the International Clas
sification of Diseases 9th Revision (ICD-9) Based Illness Severity Sco
re (ICISS) methodology developed by Rutledge and Osler can perform wel
l in this role as a severity adjustment tool in trauma patients. The p
urpose of the present study was to extend this previous work to determ
ine the ability of ICISS to predict outcomes in all types of hospitali
zed patients. Methods. The ICISS methodology was used to derive predic
tions of survival, length of hospital stay, and hospital charges in th
e entire study population. Results. A total of 821, 455 hospitalized p
atients in North Carolina in 1996 had complete data available for anal
ysis. The overall hospital mortality rate was 2.9%. ICISS was an accur
ate predictor of hospital survival in all hospitalized patients (accur
acy 95.9%, sensitivity 97.2%, and specificity 52.7%.) The area of the
receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.93, By adding age to the
model, the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve incre
ased to 0.95. ICISS also explained a large amount of the variance in h
ospital stay and charges (R-2 = 0.38 and 0.56, respectively, P < .0001
). Conclusions. This study extends previous work suggesting that ICISS
may be an important improvement over. Other presently available sever
ity adjustment models. If these findings are confirmed in comparison w
ith other predictive tools, ICISS may find an important place in asses
sing illness severity.