Rw. Schwartz et al., ASSESSING RESIDENTS CLINICAL-PERFORMANCE - CUMULATIVE RESULTS OF A 4-YEAR STUDY WITH THE OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATION, Surgery, 124(2), 1998, pp. 307-312
Background. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is an
objective method for assessing clinical skills and can be used to ide
ntify deficits in clinical skill. During the past 5 years, we have adm
inistered 4 OSCEs to all general surgery residents and interns. Method
s. Two OSCEs (1993 and 1994) were used as broad-based examinations of
the core areas of general surgery; subsequent OSCEs (1995 and 1997) we
re used as needs assessments. For each year, the reliability of the en
tire examination was calculated with Cronbach's alpha. A reliability-b
ased minimal competence score (MCS) was defined as the mean performanc
e (in percent) minus the standard error of measurement for each group
in 1997 (interns, junior residents, and senior residents). Results. Th
e reliability of each OSCE was acceptable, ranging from 0.63 to 0.91.
The MCS during the 4-year period ranged from 45% to 65%. In 1997, 4 in
terns, 2 junior residents, and 2 senior residents scored below their g
roup's MCS. MCS for the groups increased across training levels in dev
elopmental fashion (P <.05). Conclusions. Given the relatively stable
findings observed, we conclude (1) the OSCE can be used to identify gr
oup and individual differences reliably in clinical skills, and (2) we
continue to use this method to develop appropriate curricular remedia
tion for deficits in both individuals and groups.