ASSESSING RESIDENTS CLINICAL-PERFORMANCE - CUMULATIVE RESULTS OF A 4-YEAR STUDY WITH THE OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATION

Citation
Rw. Schwartz et al., ASSESSING RESIDENTS CLINICAL-PERFORMANCE - CUMULATIVE RESULTS OF A 4-YEAR STUDY WITH THE OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATION, Surgery, 124(2), 1998, pp. 307-312
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
ISSN journal
00396060
Volume
124
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
307 - 312
Database
ISI
SICI code
0039-6060(1998)124:2<307:ARC-CR>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Background. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is an objective method for assessing clinical skills and can be used to ide ntify deficits in clinical skill. During the past 5 years, we have adm inistered 4 OSCEs to all general surgery residents and interns. Method s. Two OSCEs (1993 and 1994) were used as broad-based examinations of the core areas of general surgery; subsequent OSCEs (1995 and 1997) we re used as needs assessments. For each year, the reliability of the en tire examination was calculated with Cronbach's alpha. A reliability-b ased minimal competence score (MCS) was defined as the mean performanc e (in percent) minus the standard error of measurement for each group in 1997 (interns, junior residents, and senior residents). Results. Th e reliability of each OSCE was acceptable, ranging from 0.63 to 0.91. The MCS during the 4-year period ranged from 45% to 65%. In 1997, 4 in terns, 2 junior residents, and 2 senior residents scored below their g roup's MCS. MCS for the groups increased across training levels in dev elopmental fashion (P <.05). Conclusions. Given the relatively stable findings observed, we conclude (1) the OSCE can be used to identify gr oup and individual differences reliably in clinical skills, and (2) we continue to use this method to develop appropriate curricular remedia tion for deficits in both individuals and groups.