Many claims have been made about the potential benefits and the potent
ial costs of adopting a system of universal banking in the United Stat
es. We evaluate these claims using a model where there is a moral haza
rd problem between banks and ''borrowers,'' a moral hazard problem bet
ween banks and a deposit insurer, and a costly state verification prob
lem. Under conditions we describe, allowing banks to take equity posit
ions in firms strengthens their ability to extract surplus, and exacer
bates problems of moral hazard. The incentives of universal banks to t
ake equity positions will often be strongest when these problems are m
ost severe.