COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE DURING A SIMULATED CLIMB OF MOUNT-EVEREST - IMPLICATIONS FOR BRAIN-FUNCTION AND CENTRAL ADAPTIVE PROCESSES UNDER CHRONIC HYPOXIC STRESS
Jh. Abraini et al., COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE DURING A SIMULATED CLIMB OF MOUNT-EVEREST - IMPLICATIONS FOR BRAIN-FUNCTION AND CENTRAL ADAPTIVE PROCESSES UNDER CHRONIC HYPOXIC STRESS, Pflugers Archiv, 436(4), 1998, pp. 553-559
:High altitude is characterized by hypoxic environmental conditions an
d is well known to induce both physiological and psychological disturb
ances. In the present study, called ''Everest-Comex 97'', the authors
investigated the effects of high altitude on the psychosensorimotor an
d reasoning processes of eight climbers participating in;a simulated c
limb from sea level to 8,848 m over a 31-day period of confinement in
a decompression chamber. Tests of visual reaction time, psychomotor ab
ility, and number ordination were used. The climbers' data were compar
ed with data from a similar laboratory study at sea level in control s
ubjects. Continued testing of the control subjects at sea level clearl
y led to learning effects and improvement of performance in psychomoto
r ability and number ordination. In the climbers, similar learning eff
ects occurred up to an altitude of 5,500-6,500 m. With further increas
es in altitude, the climbers' psychomotor performance and mental effic
iency deteriorated progressively, leading to significant differences i
n psychomotor ability and mental efficiency between control subjects a
nd climbers (9 and 13% respectively at 8,000 m and 17.5 and 16.5% resp
ectively at 8,848 m). Three days (72 h) after the climbers had returne
d to sea level, their mental and psychomotor performances were still s
ignificantly lower than, those of control subjects (by approximately 1
0%). In contrast, visual reaction time showed no significant changes i
n either climbers or control subjects. It is suggested that chronic hy
poxic stress could alter selectively mental learning processes, i.e. e
xplicit, rather than implicit (stimulus-response learning processes) m
emory and cortico-limbic rather than basal ganglia-sensorimotor system
function.