Froot and Obstfeld (1991) allow for an intrinsic bubble in stock price
s, using approximately a century of annual data for the US, in an atte
mpt to model the widely documented deviations from the prices predicte
d by present values or fundamentals, However they assume that the log
of real dividends follows a constant random walk with drift over the w
hole period. We show that this assumption is invalid, and that a Marko
v-switching model is a more appropriate representation of dividends. W
e then generalise the formulation of stock prices (including the intri
nsic bubble) to allow for this, and show that regime-switching provide
s a better explanation for stock prices than the bubble. We show that
when allowance is made both for the bubble and for regime-switching in
the dividend process, the incremental explanatory contribution of the
bubble is low. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.