Se. Bishara et al., EFFECTS OF VARIOUS METHODS OF CHLORHEXIDINE APPLICATION ON SHEAR BONDSTRENGTH, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 114(2), 1998, pp. 150-153
Chlorhexidine has been applied on the teeth and over orthodontic appli
ances during treatment in order to reduce bacterial colonization. The
purpose of this study was to determine whether the application of chlo
rhexidine with or without a sealant, to the etched enamel will affect
the shear bond strength and the bracket/adhesive failure modes of orth
odontic brackets. A total of 132 extracted third molars were cleaned a
nd then divided into 6 groups of at least 20 teeth each, The teeth wer
e etched with a 37% phosphoric acid gel and a sealant was applied in 5
of the groups, Stainless steel orthodontic brackets were then bonded
with the Transbond XT bending system. The chlorhexidine was applied to
the teeth either as a prophylactic paste or as a varnish under the fo
llowing conditions: (1) as a varnish over the bracket and tooth surfac
es after the bonding procedure was completed; (2) as a prophylactic pa
ste containing 0.12% chlorhexidine over the intact enamel i.e., before
etching; (3) mixed with the sealant and applied to the etched enamel
before bonding, (4) as a varnish applied to the etched enamel with no
sealant used; (5) as a varnish over the light cured sealant; and (6) a
s a varnish over the sealant before the sealant was light cured. All t
eeth were mounted in phenolic rings and stored in deionized water at 3
7 degrees C for 48 hours. A Zwick Universal Testing Machine was used t
o determine shear bond strengths, The residual adhesive on the enamel
surface was evaluated with the Adhesive Remnant Index, The analysis of
variance and chi square tests were used to compare the six groups. Si
gnificance was predetermined at the p less than or equal to 0.05. The
findings in this study indicated that shear bond strength was not sign
ificantly affected when chlorhexidine was applied; (1) over the bracke
t and tooth surfaces after the bonding procedure was completed ((x) ov
er bar = 12.3 +/- 3.1 MPa), (2) as a prophylactic paste over the unetc
hed enamel surface before the bonding procedure is initiated ((x) over
bar = 9.6 +/- 2.3 MPa), and (3) when the varnish was premixed with th
e sealant and applied on the etched enamel surface ((x) over bar 11.8
+/- 2.1 MPa). On the other hand, in all the experimental groups in whi
ch the chlorhexidine varnish was applied as a layer on the etched enam
el surface or over the sealant, shear bond strength values and bracket
failure rates were of a magnitude that made them clinically unaccepta
ble.