Ra. Penna et al., COMPARISON OF SURFACE-TREATED AND UNTREATED ORTHODONTIC BANDS - EVALUATION OF SHEAR FORCE AND SURFACE-ROUGHNESS, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 114(2), 1998, pp. 162-165
In an attempt to increase retention of orthodontic bands, orthodontic
companies market bands with surfaces prepared to increase roughness. A
comparison of six groups of bands, including two with untreated surfa
ces, revealed a wide range of variation in shear forces. Three classes
of retention may be differentiated on the basis of non-statistically
significantly different mean shear forces in each category: high (Unit
ek, treated), moderate (Unitek, untreated; A Co., treated; GAG, treate
d), and low (A Co., untreated; Dentaurum, treated). Surface roughness,
as evaluated through atomic force microscopy, correlated moderately w
ith shear force (r = 0.61; p < 0.05). This method is examined and comp
ared with the qualitative profiles of the orthodontic band surfaces pr
ovided by optical micrography.