VARIATIONS BETWEEN COUNTRIES IN INVASIVE CARDIAC PROCEDURES AND OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH SUSPECTED UNSTABLE ANGINA OR MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION WITHOUT INITIAL ST ELEVATION
S. Yusuf et al., VARIATIONS BETWEEN COUNTRIES IN INVASIVE CARDIAC PROCEDURES AND OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH SUSPECTED UNSTABLE ANGINA OR MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION WITHOUT INITIAL ST ELEVATION, Lancet, 352(9127), 1998, pp. 507-514
Background There are wide variations between countries in the use of i
nvasive cardiac catheterisation and revascularisation procedures for p
atients with acute ischaemic syndromes. We studied the relation betwee
n rates of such procedures and rates of cardiovascular death, myocardi
al infarction, stroke, refractory angina, and major bleeding in a pros
pective, registry-based study in six countries with widely varying int
ervention rates. Methods 7987 consecutive patients presenting with uns
table angina or suspected myocardial infarction without ST-segment ele
vation were recruited prospectively from 95 hospitals in six countries
and followed up for 6 months. Findings The rates of all procedures we
re highest in patients in Brazil and the USA, intermediate in Canada a
cid Australia, and lowest in Hungary and Poland. There were no signifi
cant differences in rates of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarc
tion among these countries (47% overall [range 3.7-5.6] at 7 days; 11%
overall [9-12] at 6 months), For the countries with the highest rates
of invasive procedures (59%) versus the rest (21%) there was no diffe
rence in rate of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction (adjust
ed odds ratio 0.88 at 7 days and 1.0 at 6 months). Rates of stroke wer
e higher in Brazil and the USA than in the countries with lower interv
ention rates (adjusted odds ratio at 7 days 3.0, p=0.012; at 6 months
1.8, p=0.004) but rates of refractory angina at 7 days (0.7, p<0.001)
and readmission for unstable angina at 0.83 (10.6% vs 12.5%, p=0.05) a
nd for refractory angina of 1.25 (19.3% vs 16.1%, p=0.09). Interpretat
ion Higher rates of invasive and revascularisation procedures were ass
ociated with lower rates of refractory angina or readmission for unsta
ble angina, no apparent reducton in cardiovascular death or myocardial
infarction, but with higher rates of stroke. Randomised trials should
assess the relative impact of conservative and more aggressive approa
ches to invasive cardiac procedures and revascularisations in patients
with unstable angina.