The evaluation of functional status as an outcome for patients with ca
rdiac disease has become common practice in both clinical settings and
research studies. However,the measurement of functional status lacks
conceptual clarity, frequently focuses on only one dimension of functi
oning, and overlooks the individuality of the patient. Some measures o
f functional status have questionable sensitivity to capture change ov
er lime, or the ability to discriminate between groups, and lack repor
ts of reliability and validity testing. The purpose of this article is
to discuss critical issues related to the evaluation of functional st
atus, with a focus on objective and subjective measures of functional
status frequently used in cardiac populations.