Letter series and number series tests, consisting of items based on id
entical rules, were administered in a counterbalanced design to 58 per
sons (46 women and 12 men) between the ages of 61 and 88 years to dete
rmine their relative efficacy (relative difficulty and acceptability)
as measures of inductive/deductive reasoning ability. Results indicate
d that letter and number series tests, in which each item in one has a
same-rule counterpart in the other, were not equivalent in regard to
their relative difficulty or popularity among the elderly. The number
series test was significantly (p<.0001) easier and more popular than i
ts letter series counterpart. Some of the implications of these findin
gs for assessing reasoning ability in the elderly were specified.