Mb. Wallace et al., IS COLONOSCOPY INDICATED FOR SMALL ADENOMAS FOUND BY SCREENING FLEXIBLE SIGMOIDOSCOPY, Annals of internal medicine, 129(4), 1998, pp. 273
Background: There is controversy over whether patients who have a smal
l tubular adenoma on screening flexible sigmoidoscopy should undergo c
olonoscopic examination of the proximal colon. Objective: To prospecti
vely determine the prevalence of advanced polyps in the proximal colon
among patients who have small adenomas on screening sigmoidoscopy. De
sign: Prospective cohort study. Setting: A health maintenance organiza
tion and a Veterans Affairs medical center. Patients: Asymptomatic pat
ients older than 50 years of age who had no risk factors for colon can
cer and underwent sigmoidoscopy. Intervention: At the time of sigmoido
scopy, all polyps were biopsied and characterized. All patients with d
istal adenomas were offered colonoscopy. Measurements: The size and hi
stology of polyps identified by sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy were not
ed. Polyps were considered advanced if they were larger than 10 mm or
were tubulovillous, villous, or malignant. The prevalence of advanced
proximal polyps was determined, and patients were stratified by the si
ze and number of distal polyps found by sigmoidoscopy. Results: Among
4490 patients who underwent sigmoidoscopy, a neoplastic lesion was det
ected in 401 (8.9%) and colonoscopy was done in 301 (75%). Of 90 patie
nts with a single tubular adenoma 1 to 5 mm in diameter in the distal
colon, 0% (95% CI, 0.0% to 4.0%) had an advanced proximal polyp compar
ed with 5.4% (CI, 2.4% to 10.4%) of those who had multiple distal poly
ps 1 to 5 mm or 6 to 10 mm in diameter and 7.9% (CI, 2.6% to 17.6%) of
those who had advanced distal polyps (P = 0.013 for trend). The low-r
isk group with a single tubular adenoma 1 to 5 mm in diameter represen
ted 44% of all patients with distal adenomas or cancers found at flexi
ble sigmoidoscopy. Conclusions: Among patients undergoing screening si
gmoidoscopy, those with single tubular adenomas of 5 mm or less had a
low prevalence of advanced proximal polyps. These patients may not ben
efit from colonoscopy.