In the field of game theoretical research in sociology, there are two
different approaches, rational choice approach and evolutionary approa
ch. Rational choice approach postulates actors' high caluculas ability
and they are assumed to select Nash equilibria with consideration bef
ore the game. On the other hand, in evolutionary approach, actors only
have bounded rationality and they select better strategy after the ga
me in repeated games. These two approaches have been believed to be me
thodologically different. But recent advance in evolutionary game theo
ry combines these two approaches. It is clarified that Stable States i
n an evolutionary game correspond to Nash equilibria in one-shot game,
so actors with bounded rationality can select Nash equilibria. These
two approach should be called ''rational choice theory in the wide sen
se'' and they can go together fruitfully.