Nr. Hall et al., CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN INVOLVEMENT AFTER MESORECTAL EXCISION OF RECTAL-CANCER WITH CURATIVE INTENT - PREDICTOR OF SURVIVAL BUT NOT LOCAL RECURRENCE, Diseases of the colon & rectum, 41(8), 1998, pp. 979-983
PURPOSE: This study examines the prognostic significance of circumfere
ntial margin involvement by tumor in resected specimens after potentia
lly curative rectal cancer surgery. METHODS: During an eight-year peri
od, all patients with rectal cancer were prospectively audited. For tu
mors of the middle and lower thirds of the rectum, a total mesorectal
excision was performed; for tumors of the upper third, mesorectal exci
sion proceeded at least 5 cm distal to the primary tumor. Resected spe
cimens were subjected to careful histologic assessment, and patients u
ndergoing curative procedures were entered into a surveillance program
to detect both local and distant recurrence. RESULTS: Of 218 patients
in the cohort, 9 had no resection, 14 underwent local excision, 1 had
pre-operative radiotherapy, and 42 patients (20 percent) had palliati
ve resections and were excluded from further analysis. This left 152 p
atients having a curative resection, of whom 20 (13 percent) had tumor
within 1 mm of the circumferential margin. After follow-up until deat
h or a median period of 41 months, recurrent disease was seen in 24 pe
rcent of patients with a negative margin and 50 percent with a positiv
e margin. Both disease-free survival and mortality were significantly
related to margin involvement (log-rank, P = 0.01 and P = 0.005, respe
ctively). Local recurrence, however, was not significantly different i
n the two groups (11 and 15 percent, respectively; log-rank, P = 0.38)
. CONCLUSIONS: When a mesorectal excision is performed, circumferentia
l margin involvement is more an indicator of advanced disease than ina
dequate local surgery. Patients with an involved margin may die from d
istant disease before local recurrence becomes apparent.