RELATION BETWEEN THE CHANGES OF ONCOGENE VERSUS TUMOR-SUPPRESSOR GENEINTERACTION AND THE TRANSITION OF CANCER RISK FROM FEMALE DOMINANCE THROUGH NO SES DISCRIMINATION TO MALE-DOMINANCE, AS INVESTIGATED BY THERECIPROCAL REGRESSION-ANALYSIS OF 5 HUMAN NEOPLASIAS
M. Kodama et al., RELATION BETWEEN THE CHANGES OF ONCOGENE VERSUS TUMOR-SUPPRESSOR GENEINTERACTION AND THE TRANSITION OF CANCER RISK FROM FEMALE DOMINANCE THROUGH NO SES DISCRIMINATION TO MALE-DOMINANCE, AS INVESTIGATED BY THERECIPROCAL REGRESSION-ANALYSIS OF 5 HUMAN NEOPLASIAS, Oncology Reports, 5(5), 1998, pp. 1163-1169
We have been investigating the mathematical nature of intercancer link
age that underlies the mutual regulation of cancer risks between any 2
tumors in their variations in time and space. Applications of both se
quential regression test and topological manipulation of age-adjusted
incidence rate (AAIR) data set enabled us to prepare the oncogene (Onc
) activation profile and the tumor suppressor gene (TSG) inactivation
profile for each tumor. The purpose of this study was to investigate t
he relation between the changes of 2 cancer gene profiles and the sex
discrimination of cancer risk in 7 human neoplasias. Results obtained
are as follows: i) The sex discrimination of cancer risk could better
be defined by the use of log-transformed AAIR data rather than of untr
ansformed AAIR data, ii) The sex discrimination of cancer risk, as cal
culated with the AAIR data of 47 population units of the world, is as
follows: a) breast cancer (Br), M:F=1:120.2; b) thyroid cancer (Thy),
M:F=1:2.64; c) colon cancer (Co), M:F=1.18:1; d) liver cancer (Li), M:
F=2.63:1; e) lung cancer (Lu), M:F=3.66:1; f) esophageal cancer (Eso),
M:F=3.68:1; g) laryngeal cancer (Lar ) MF=7.26:1. iii) Female-dominan
t cancers were associated with inversion (Br) or defectiveness (Thy) o
f male oncogene profile, whereas male-dominant cancers were associated
with inversion (Lar) or defectiveness (Li, Lu and Eso) of female One
profiles. Sex-indifferent cancer, Co, was distinguished from other tum
ors by the emergence of defectiveness in the TSG profiles of both sexe
s. TSG defectiveness was also detectable in female (Br, Thy) and bisex
ual (Lu) tumors, iv) The One vs TSG interaction, as assessed in terms
of r value of the reciprocal regression analysis, was increasing in it
s positivity rate from the top of the female-dominant family (Br) thro
ugh the sex-indifferent tumor (Co) to the bottom of the male-dominant
family (Lar). In conclusion, the emergence of sex discrimination of ca
ncer risk was positively correlated to the extent of integrity of onco
gene activation in the dominant gender relative to the recessive gende
r. Findings with 6 sex-discriminant tumors are discussed in their rele
vancy to tumorigenesis from the point of view of endocrinological epid
emiology.