Gk. Luthra et al., COMPARISON OF BIOPSY AND SEROLOGICAL METHODS OF DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTER-PYLORI INFECTION AND THE POTENTIAL ROLE OF ANTIBIOTICS, The American journal of gastroenterology, 93(8), 1998, pp. 1291-1296
Objective: Endoscopic biopsy and serological methods were compared for
their ability to detect Helicobacter pylori infection in patients und
ergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at a state university hospita
l. Methods: Subjects mere characterized on the basis of gastrointestin
al symptoms, endoscopic findings, socioeconomic and demographic featur
es, and the use of certain medications, tobacco, and alcohol. Current
infection was detected in gastric antral specimens by rapid urease tes
ting, histopathology, and bacterial culture, Serum levels of IgG to H.
pylori were measured by ELISA, Results: Of 240 subjects, 115 (47.9%)
were currently infected as determined by rapid urease testing, histopa
thology, and/or culture results, whereas 63.3% had elevated anti-H, py
lori IgG levels (p < 0.001). This difference in the prevalence of curr
ent infection and seropositivity was preserved when the study populati
on was analyzed according to age, race, gender, and other characterist
ics. Prior use of antibiotics was associated with a significant reduct
ion in the frequency of H, pylori infection, Conclusions: Serological
evidence of H, pylori infection was consistently greater than the prev
alence of infection documented by biopsy methods in this study, sugges
ting suppression or recent clearance of infection. Further studies are
needed to examine the factors that may affect the detection of H, pyl
ori infection. (Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:1291-1296. (C) 1998 by Am.
Coll. of Gastroenterology).